Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 26 Jul 2002 05:23:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 26 Jul 2002 05:23:56 -0400 Received: from pc2-cwma1-5-cust12.swa.cable.ntl.com ([80.5.121.12]:27892 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 26 Jul 2002 05:23:55 -0400 Subject: Re: 2.4.19-rc3-ac3 ide_map_buffer/ide_unmap_buffer From: Alan Cox To: "Charles R. Anderson" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20020725193806.U7778@angus.ind.WPI.EDU> References: <20020725193806.U7778@angus.ind.WPI.EDU> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.3 (1.0.3-6) Date: 26 Jul 2002 11:41:35 +0100 Message-Id: <1027680095.13428.27.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 904 Lines: 19 On Fri, 2002-07-26 at 00:38, Charles R. Anderson wrote: > > Which one should I apply? I'm inclined to keep the Red Hat bits, since > the ac3 ide_unmap_buffer does nothing. > > [For anyone wondering, I have a new Dell with an Intel 845G chipset for > which I would like DMA support, etc. I'm attempting to merge > 2.4.19-rc3-ac3 with Red Hat's patches. If anyone has a simple patch for > 82801DB IDE DMA support which applies to 2.4.18 I'd be much obliged.] Thats a non trivial merge. I don't think there is anything in the base RH that matters except for big (1Gb plus) servers that isnt in -ac. You can also pick up the rawhide kernel if you are brave - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/