Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752586Ab1EWI4s (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 May 2011 04:56:48 -0400 Received: from mail-bw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:63844 "EHLO mail-bw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750883Ab1EWI4q (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 May 2011 04:56:46 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=szeredi.hu; s=google; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=RHvj24wm8TLbiqi/7pIbgKB/7r/Z8hmqiu4yiKhKzUCY/fI/vkYPuYD4rTQKQQw81r rpO3vSkgU5vWQCzMLnebsS03TUf7aJ8EV8ZSbeo0V3EElHplQQ9BMHJQeX87/Ll9XX0V Wa+lGbTd91tSjmszzTCk6dHWG3GQPnCEMdfsU= From: Miklos Szeredi To: Erez Zadok Cc: "viro\@ZenIV.linux.org.uk" , "linux-fsdevel\@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" , "akpm\@linux-foundation.org" , "apw\@canonical.com" , "nbd\@openwrt.org" , "neilb\@suse.de" , "hramrach\@centrum.cz" , "jordipujolp\@gmail.com" Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] overlay filesystem (inode.c bad error path) References: <1305635452-14835-1-git-send-email-miklos@szeredi.hu> <103d3f78e2d3478d8bb93f5dda3a4a08@HUBCAS1.cs.stonybrook.edu> <87wrhlah1e.fsf@tucsk.pomaz.szeredi.hu> <7dcd9c4e62864bc6aae66f5a4e3f3752@HUBCAS1.cs.stonybrook.edu> <2983EA36-BB3B-4AE3-9CAA-5A3C2D884DCF@fsl.cs.sunysb.edu> Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 10:57:02 +0200 In-Reply-To: <2983EA36-BB3B-4AE3-9CAA-5A3C2D884DCF@fsl.cs.sunysb.edu> (Erez Zadok's message of "Sat, 21 May 2011 00:26:47 -0400") Message-ID: <87aaed23s1.fsf@tucsk.pomaz.szeredi.hu> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 782 Lines: 20 Erez Zadok writes: > Done: reverted my ovl patches and applied yours. And indeed, the NULL > oopses don't show up after 10 minutes of running. Just to be sure, I > ran overlayfs on top of ext2, ext3, xfs, reiserfs, and tmps — no > oopses. And I wasn't able to reproduce the WARN_ON in ovl_permission. Great, thanks for testing. Pushed to .v9 branch. > Are you interested in testing overlayfs on top of NFS at this time? No, not as an upper layer. NFS as a lower layer should work fine. Thanks, Miklos -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/