Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757907Ab1EWXyH (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 May 2011 19:54:07 -0400 Received: from atl.turmel.org ([74.117.157.138]:56513 "EHLO atl.turmel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752467Ab1EWXyD (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 May 2011 19:54:03 -0400 Message-ID: <4DDAF394.7050405@turmel.org> Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 19:53:56 -0400 From: Phil Turmel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110518 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linus Torvalds CC: Ingo Molnar , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, DRI , linux-fsdevel , linux-mm , Andrew Morton , Greg KH Subject: Re: (Short?) merge window reminder References: <20110523192056.GC23629@elte.hu> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 985 Lines: 27 Hi Linus, On 05/23/2011 04:33 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: >> >> I really hope there's also a voice that tells you to wait until .42 before >> cutting 3.0.0! :-) > > So I'm toying with 3.0 (and in that case, it really would be "3.0", > not "3.0.0" - the stable team would get the third digit rather than > the fourth one. A few months ago, I briefly considered suggesting that the demise of the BKL would be a suitable milestone for the numbering shakeup. But I am a mere mortal lurker, and I remember past flame-fests this topic spawned. So I chickened out. As a small-scale linux evangelist, I would sure like to skip the explanation of the version numbers. Phil -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/