Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 26 Jul 2002 14:15:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 26 Jul 2002 14:15:45 -0400 Received: from pc2-cwma1-5-cust12.swa.cable.ntl.com ([80.5.121.12]:51705 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 26 Jul 2002 14:15:44 -0400 Subject: Re: Looking for links: Why Linux Doesn't Page Kernel Memory? From: Alan Cox To: Russell Lewis Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <3D418DFD.8000007@deming-os.org> References: <3D418DFD.8000007@deming-os.org> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.3 (1.0.3-6) Date: 26 Jul 2002 20:33:25 +0100 Message-Id: <1027712005.14773.12.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 815 Lines: 17 On Fri, 2002-07-26 at 18:59, Russell Lewis wrote: > I have spent some time working on AIX, which pages its kernel memory. > It pins the interrupt handler functions, and any data that they access, > but does not pin the other code. > > I'm looking for links as to why (unless I'm mistaken) Linux doesn't do > this, so I can better understand the system. Memory is relatively cheap, and the complexity of such a paging kernel is huge (you have to pin down disk driver and I/O paths for example). Linux prefers to try to keep simple debuggable approaches to things. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/