Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757355Ab1EXSmo (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 May 2011 14:42:44 -0400 Received: from mail-vx0-f174.google.com ([209.85.220.174]:60985 "EHLO mail-vx0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755214Ab1EXSmm (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 May 2011 14:42:42 -0400 Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 14:42:38 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-X-Sender: nico@xanadu.home To: Grant Likely cc: Russell King , Arnd Bergmann , Thomas Gleixner , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [git pull] ARM Device tree support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LFD 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1084 Lines: 26 On Mon, 23 May 2011, Grant Likely wrote: > Hi Russell, > > How do you want to handle merging the ARM DT support? Do you want to > pull it into your tree, or would you like me to ask Linus to pull > directly? As you can see, It does include a couple of pre-requisite > cross-arch cleanups that I normally push to Linus directly. I don't think that Linus would object to you pushing that to him directly, given that Russell has already agreed to those patches going in this cycle. Whatever the path, it is however important that they do get in _this_ cycle. Most people are just too nervous committing themselves to DT if the basic stuff doesn't hit mainline. And if we are serious about _trying_ to change the state of things in ARM land by going the DT route then we must have this in mainline as soon as possible. Nicolas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/