Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757428Ab1EXW6k (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 May 2011 18:58:40 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.9]:63466 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754053Ab1EXW6h (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 May 2011 18:58:37 -0400 From: "Hans-Peter Jansen" To: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: (Short?) merge window reminder Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 01:00:07 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 Cc: Ingo Molnar , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, DRI , "linux-fsdevel" , "linux-mm" , Andrew Morton , Greg KH , aufs-users@lists.sourceforge.net References: <20110523192056.GC23629@elte.hu> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201105250100.08708.hpj@urpla.net> X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:++ayveSQbSleo76l7op9r8NMFsYK+g1k3RGBIwQCYvy buS745BiJlsY4OCMFgwZvzt1/2CbZs87ErxhEE5uhO3xK269kB ZU6L50qrtU8w/f+NFas5ym6c02sh9zrKDx4XAv5uYeDe9YAIpa LjhYneeO4TuiTGCPGKlw4GhfECFPZ23mWAK4tfm7YzRGFLZMTq 74rcmZMRPN+6GM0lB2+s9mxtCBP3C32QRK1S4fYU2Y= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1425 Lines: 35 On Monday 23 May 2011, 22:33:48 Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > I really hope there's also a voice that tells you to wait until .42 > > before cutting 3.0.0! :-) > > So I'm toying with 3.0 (and in that case, it really would be "3.0", > not "3.0.0" - the stable team would get the third digit rather than > the fourth one. > > But no, it wouldn't be for 42. Despite THHGTTG, I think "40" is a > fairly nice round number. > > There's also the timing issue - since we no longer do version numbers > based on features, but based on time, just saying "we're about to > start the third decade" works as well as any other excuse. But hey, do you really want to release a Linux 3.0 kernel without serious layered filesystem functionality? Shame on you, Pete PS.: Sorry for being such a pest in this regard, but filesystem layering is one of the most important missing bits to excel out of the box in * live distros * diskless computing * flash based systems Even the linux based commercial PBX solution (mobydick), I bought, ships with it. PPS.: Bad timing, I know, but I'm glad, that Al is back to life again.. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/