Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757582Ab1EYM1t (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 May 2011 08:27:49 -0400 Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.125]:62287 "EHLO hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755403Ab1EYM1r (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 May 2011 08:27:47 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=ou1QuR4lBR9YeJgEH9ccYmbAdaWqVVq3lOvCKJtMpGM= c=1 sm=0 a=inQdEuNhf_oA:10 a=5SG0PmZfjMsA:10 a=Q9fys5e9bTEA:10 a=OPBmh+XkhLl+Enan7BmTLg==:17 a=SeIH2MewVOiKIAviXS8A:9 a=PUjeQqilurYA:10 a=OPBmh+XkhLl+Enan7BmTLg==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 67.242.120.143 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] tracing: add __print_symbolic_u64 to avoid warnings on 32bit machine From: Steven Rostedt To: liubo Cc: Linux Btrfs , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Chris Mason In-Reply-To: <4DDDE9E6.7090303@cn.fujitsu.com> References: <4D9573DB.4010009@cn.fujitsu.com> <1301665762.2160.22.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <4D9C2FF6.7090607@cn.fujitsu.com> <1303150309.7181.51.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <4DACE6E0.7000507@cn.fujitsu.com> <4DBA8C95.4000300@cn.fujitsu.com> <1304264124.25414.1079.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <4DDDE9E6.7090303@cn.fujitsu.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 08:27:44 -0400 Message-ID: <1306326464.1465.85.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1242 Lines: 38 On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 01:49 -0400, liubo wrote: > On 05/01/2011 11:35 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 18:01 +0800, liubo wrote: > >> ping? > > > > Sorry, I've been trying to get the new ftrace function tracer features > > out ASAP. I plan on looking at this when I'm done. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Hi, Steven, > > I've seen your latest git-pull, but these 2 patches are not included yet, > so is there any problem with them? Actually, I was trying to get out what I had. There's a bit more patches that I need to process still. This being one of them. But what I sent out previously is not going into 2.6.40 anyway. Ingo feels that it's too late in the merge window to pull those changes and wants to wait till the next merge window. Since there's some fixes in that pull request, I'll need to cherry pick them out and rebase the rest for the next window. I'll look at this patch soon. It's still in my queue "todo" ;) -- Steve > > If it does, I can be helpful. :) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/