Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754580Ab1EZHP1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 May 2011 03:15:27 -0400 Received: from mail-qy0-f174.google.com ([209.85.216.174]:59695 "EHLO mail-qy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751779Ab1EZHP0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 May 2011 03:15:26 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20110526043344.GA2749@acer> References: <20110525195413.GC2996@acer> <20110526043344.GA2749@acer> Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 09:15:25 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] dmaengine: add ep93xx DMA support From: Linus Walleij To: Mika Westerberg Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Vinod Koul , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hsweeten@visionengravers.com, ryan@bluewatersys.com, Dan Williams , Grant Likely , spi mailing list Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 971 Lines: 23 On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 6:33 AM, Mika Westerberg wrote: > Do you think that we can go forward with this patch series if I drop the last > patch (spi/ep93xx: add DMA support)? This way we will have dmaengine > implementation in place, whatever SPI driver we choose to use with ep93xx. Yes and you don't have to drop any DMA support for the existing driver for me alone, now that it's in the tree it should be maintained. I only wanted to raise the issue of code duplication, not block any patches. > We can then try to use amba-pl022 driver with ep93xx and see if it works or > not, and how much work is needed. I would like some comments from Hartley and > Ryan also. Sure. Thanks, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/