Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 10:15:21 +0200 (CEST)
From: Armin Schindler <armin@melware.de>
To: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>
cc: linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/34] isdn/diva: Drop __TIME__ usage
In-Reply-To: <4DDD68C3.7000004@suse.cz>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1105261012360.20696@justus.melware.de>
References: <1302015561-21047-1-git-send-email-mmarek@suse.cz> <1302015561-21047-13-git-send-email-mmarek@suse.cz> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1104051709040.7262@justus.melware.de> <4DDD68C3.7000004@suse.cz>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
Organization: Cytronics & Melware
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1016
Lines: 28

On Wed, 25 May 2011, Michal Marek wrote:
> Dne 5.4.2011 17:10, Armin Schindler napsal(a):
>> On Tue, 5 Apr 2011, Michal Marek wrote:
>>> The kernel already prints its build timestamp during boot, no need to
>>> repeat it in random drivers and produce different object files each
>>> time.
>>
>> The module can be build separately from the kernel, therefore it can have
>> an own build timestamp.
>
> So the module timestamp and kernel timestamp vary by a couple of
> minutes. But is it really a problem?

It could be a lot more than minutes. But it isn't a problem.
I just tried to keep the sources in sync with out-of-tree version.

> I don't think so. So is there an
> objection against applying this patch?

No objection. Please go ahead with the patch.

Thanks
Armin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/