DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version
         :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent;
        b=Kv06wF80peoGCTdoXkwYICw9axIRJ0bK4SByLHhkytbCnCMDTv//TSrYxzv5SxwSSl
         84rQaIMyGg/6dsLJPIpY5Yt7et+akwBUkH8DZItcJxnEZCvUgA8KTenI13xXAhs1aYKr
         A0XATkS4o4uvT8tyOmFFrXjkKkS4KNkMZ2bnI=
Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 21:38:01 +0300
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@iki.fi>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hsweeten@visionengravers.com,
        ryan@bluewatersys.com, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
        Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
        spi mailing list <spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] dmaengine: add ep93xx DMA support
Message-ID: <20110526183800.GE2957@acer>
References: <cover.1306082097.git.mika.westerberg@iki.fi>
 <e6777eb9f7228ee1dadec1f0c9f16c3afc44c307.1306082097.git.mika.westerberg@iki.fi>
 <BANLkTi=3z3kO5VEe2up8Mfm+bNXkY3baUw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20110525195413.GC2996@acer>
 <BANLkTin8Trn-44Op+GbxrgocFrnPuXUZ2w@mail.gmail.com>
 <20110526043344.GA2749@acer>
 <BANLkTikzrXRmdnv_v_nmJw7Nvsr6TY-5RQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTikzrXRmdnv_v_nmJw7Nvsr6TY-5RQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1106
Lines: 21

On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 09:15:25AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 6:33 AM, Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@iki.fi> wrote:
> 
> > Do you think that we can go forward with this patch series if I drop the last
> > patch (spi/ep93xx: add DMA support)? This way we will have dmaengine
> > implementation in place, whatever SPI driver we choose to use with ep93xx.
> 
> Yes and you don't have to drop any DMA support for the existing driver
> for me alone, now that it's in the tree it should be maintained. I only
> wanted to raise the issue of code duplication, not block any patches.

Ok, so I'll keep the last patch for now.

BTW: if we get amba-pl022 driver to work with ep93xx, do you have any ideas
how to proceed from there? I mean, should we convert existing users to use
that driver instead and finally remove the ep93xx_spi driver?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/