Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932747Ab1EZVPh (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 May 2011 17:15:37 -0400 Received: from mail-bw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:48093 "EHLO mail-bw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754440Ab1EZVPg convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 May 2011 17:15:36 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=KBm0g6PvRjCSnybIqzQ1YvoWOridRICD8ZqESxfcwhZJyljYixlorINRfzr9kztNBs pVdwFctz8pyYzSdUXam9J8mVa8G+wj2UyiOPGclEgguJ9qNILBEudyd4vSv3tWdfwJwQ oZhR2iC+UkNoo/yIIZVAAvXdcejN99zyJxK+4= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20110526120702.fac24de0.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> References: <20110526163941.7dfcad1a.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20110526120702.fac24de0.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 23:15:34 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for May 26 (drivers/net/caif) From: =?UTF-8?Q?Sjur_Br=C3=A6ndeland?= To: Randy Dunlap , balbi@ti.com Cc: Stephen Rothwell , netdev , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , gregkh@suse.de Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1025 Lines: 27 Hi Randy, [Randy] > (not new) > > drivers/net/caif/caif_serial.c:194: warning: 'return' with no value, in function returning non-void > drivers/net/caif/caif_serial.c:202: warning: 'return' with no value, in function returning non-void > > > I'm curious:  how do warnings like this get overlooked? > too much noise in the build messages?  or it wasn't overlooked, just ignored? The patch introducing this problem is "tty: make receive_buf() return the amout of bytes received" by Felipe Balbi . It seems that this patch has been posted to linux-serial and not to the netdev list or the gits net-next-2.6 or net-2.6 that I follow. It's probably no excuse, but this problem is news to me. Should I post a patch on linux-next anyway for this issue? Regards, Sjur -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/