Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 27 Jul 2002 11:42:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 27 Jul 2002 11:42:38 -0400 Received: from monster.nni.com ([216.107.0.51]:48136 "EHLO admin.nni.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 27 Jul 2002 11:42:38 -0400 Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2002 11:45:09 -0400 From: Andrew Rodland To: "David D. Hagood" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Speaker twiddling [was: Re: Panicking in morse code] Message-Id: <20020727114509.0a1eee2a.arodland@noln.com> In-Reply-To: <3D4298C6.9080103@sktc.net> References: <20020727000005.54da5431.arodland@noln.com> <200207270526.g6R5Qw942780@saturn.cs.uml.edu> <20020727015703.21f47a37.arodland@noln.com> <3D4298C6.9080103@sktc.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.7.8claws55 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-debian-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1718 Lines: 42 On Sat, 27 Jul 2002 07:57:42 -0500 "David D. Hagood" wrote: > I don't understand the direction this discussion is taking. > > Either you are trying to output the panic information with minimal > hardware, and in a form a human might be able to decode, in which case > the Morse option seems to me to be the best, or you are trying to > panic in a machine readable format - in which case just dump the data > out /dev/ttyS0 and be done with it! > > To my way of thinking, the idea of the Morse option is that if an oops > > happens when you are not expecting it, and you haven't set up any > equipment to help you, you still have a shot at getting the data. To my way of thinking, this is still 'minimal' -- it's just a different minimum. It's the 'minimum' way to get the panic message out digitally, in such a way that I might be able to recover it using a tape recorder or a telephone. Actually, morse is probably that, but morse loses data and doesn't have any redundancy. And with a setup pretty similar to what acalahan posted, It can be written with a minimum of complexity (maybe less than morse) and hardware (still just pc speaker). Anyway, I don't expect for other people to use most of what I'm going to be playing with with this, and my (disconnected) vacation next week provides the perfect opportunity for me to play with it all I want without bothering the list. And I've got some mighty interesting ideas now. Thanks --hobbs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/