Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 27 Jul 2002 15:14:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 27 Jul 2002 15:14:48 -0400 Received: from flrtn-5-m1-95.vnnyca.adelphia.net ([24.55.70.95]:1162 "EHLO jyro.mirai.cx") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 27 Jul 2002 15:14:47 -0400 Message-ID: <3D42F1DA.5060309@tmsusa.com> Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2002 12:17:46 -0700 From: J Sloan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1b) Gecko/20020727 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua CC: "Albert D. Cahalan" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: keep code simple References: <200207270323.g6R3Nkb39182@saturn.cs.uml.edu> <200207271907.g6RJ7ST27551@Port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 666 Lines: 31 Denis Vlasenko wrote: >On 27 July 2002 01:23, Albert D. Cahalan wrote: > > >>Remember that "optimized" code often runs slower than >>simple code. >> >> > >A bit offtopic, but: I heard M$ and Intel compilers beat GCC >by 20-40% in terms of code size. Why GCC is so much behind? > > er... one big reason is that gcc is cross platform, while ms and intel can cut corners and optimize for x86 Just my $.02 Joe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/