Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 27 Jul 2002 16:37:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 27 Jul 2002 16:37:41 -0400 Received: from rwcrmhc51.attbi.com ([204.127.198.38]:51678 "EHLO rwcrmhc51.attbi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 27 Jul 2002 16:37:41 -0400 From: "Buddy Lumpkin" To: "Rik van Riel" , "Ville Herva" Cc: "DervishD" , "Linux-kernel" Subject: RE: About the need of a swap area Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2002 13:41:49 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.3018.1300 Importance: Normal Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 840 Lines: 27 >Much more. > >The latency difference seems to be on the order of 100000 times. >It is the latency we care about because that determines how long >the CPU cannot do anything useful but has to wait. > >Rik And if you look at the ratio between the access time of ram which is in the low nanoseconds (1* 10 ^ -9) (data and address must be present for at least the rated number of ns to guarantee a sucessful read or write). and compare it to the seek + rotational delay of a discrete spindal which is in low milliseconds (1* 10 ^ -3) that puts you at a ratio of about 1000000. regards, --Buddy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/