Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752077Ab1E2HnM (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 May 2011 03:43:12 -0400 Received: from mail-wy0-f174.google.com ([74.125.82.174]:46053 "EHLO mail-wy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751564Ab1E2HnL (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 May 2011 03:43:11 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date :message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=kl0MxWXSISrCcStTp8lMBiWPK6mhj/Slwf8NMcCOBv+96jeauVc2aT4AWODhtpDbU4 4CBI4PacGahr1dsaenJzEMUhbEo9CdMsGTYi9Bi4e7aamiW/lbZuJtPCXvCkMvEhR1iX wdDL+8hc2jMJ2hokd3B+93/Om76IET1D2Ft9c= Subject: Re: Kernel crash after using new Intel NIC (igb) From: Eric Dumazet To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Arun Sharma , David Miller , Maximilian Engelhardt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, StuStaNet Vorstand , Yann Dupont , Denys Fedoryshchenko , Thomas Gleixner In-Reply-To: <20110529073840.GB21254@elte.hu> References: <4DDECA9B.8080206@fb.com> <1306447292.2543.32.camel@edumazet-laptop> <4DDEEBC5.80804@fb.com> <1306466831.2543.58.camel@edumazet-laptop> <4DDFE4D6.4010000@fb.com> <1306526219.2533.3.camel@edumazet-laptop> <20110527211419.GA6793@dev1756.snc6.facebook.com> <1306561285.2533.9.camel@edumazet-laptop> <20110528180434.GB12530@elte.hu> <1306654424.30021.7.camel@edumazet-laptop> <20110529073840.GB21254@elte.hu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 09:43:03 +0200 Message-ID: <1306654983.30021.10.camel@edumazet-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 910 Lines: 25 Le dimanche 29 mai 2011 à 09:38 +0200, Ingo Molnar a écrit : > Yes and i do this all the time as well, to make life easier for the > stable team. > > What wasnt fine was to not follow up the backportable hack with the > proper patch though. Or did you plan to do that yourself if Arun > fails to complete the generic variant? (in which case my remark is > moot) > I am currently working on seqlock.h split into seqcount.h and seqlock.h, because I really need this split, but can take care of this work too, no problem : I asked Arun if he wanted to make this himself, because initial idea was coming from him, not because I did not want to make it ;) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/