Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 15 Dec 2000 09:25:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 15 Dec 2000 09:25:36 -0500 Received: from brutus.conectiva.com.br ([200.250.58.146]:57847 "EHLO brutus.conectiva.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 15 Dec 2000 09:25:17 -0500 Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 11:54:10 -0200 (BRDT) From: Rik van Riel To: Rob Landley cc: maddog@valinux.com, torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Is there a Linux trademark issue with sun? In-Reply-To: <20001215022730.11497.qmail@web5203.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Rob Landley wrote: > Heads up everybody. Scott McNealy has apparently been > calling Solaris Sun's implementation of Linux. > Trademark violation time. > > The article's here: > > http://linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2000-12-14-020-04-NW-CY > > Quick quote: > > >When asked by a reporter why Sun's new clustering > >software was restricted to Solaris and not available > >on Linux, McNealy's aggravation seemed to peak. "You > >people just don't get it, do you? All Linux > >applications run on Solaris, which is our > >implementation of Linux. Now ask the question again," I wouldn't worry about this. It's only a question of time before people will start to ask him why Sun isn't shipping the "original Linux" but has their own, strange, version ;) cheers, Rik -- Hollywood goes for world dumbination, Trailer at 11. http://www.surriel.com/ http://www.conectiva.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com.br/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/