Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756737Ab1EaFiL (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 May 2011 01:38:11 -0400 Received: from mail-pw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.160.46]:48415 "EHLO mail-pw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751064Ab1EaFiJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 May 2011 01:38:09 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=iW/KAgI0Q2WE7MzuGyZ4yI7UIIDssCZwP1lqjuKhJukQLZddHiX74xB+R7uzI0FVGO N9qBZw471/U5RnpgvvLmS49JAkLMRTR1cS2eD0lmsiKp7UcksrU1p2sLZTTCWBOK84+r eVd8xWQtctOQ2SpMeFH+jG7/ky11zS5e/eIeo= Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 14:38:02 +0900 From: Minchan Kim To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Cc: Mel Gorman , akpm@linux-foundation.org, Ury Stankevich , KOSAKI Motohiro , Andrea Arcangeli , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, stable@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: compaction: Abort compaction if too many pages are isolated and caller is asynchronous Message-ID: <20110531053802.GA1519@barrios-laptop> References: <20110530131300.GQ5044@csn.ul.ie> <20110531134835.b7c9edc2.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110531134835.b7c9edc2.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1854 Lines: 49 Hi Kame, On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 01:48:35PM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > On Mon, 30 May 2011 14:13:00 +0100 > Mel Gorman wrote: > > > Asynchronous compaction is used when promoting to huge pages. This is > > all very nice but if there are a number of processes in compacting > > memory, a large number of pages can be isolated. An "asynchronous" > > process can stall for long periods of time as a result with a user > > reporting that firefox can stall for 10s of seconds. This patch aborts > > asynchronous compaction if too many pages are isolated as it's better to > > fail a hugepage promotion than stall a process. > > > > If accepted, this should also be considered for 2.6.39-stable. It should > > also be considered for 2.6.38-stable but ideally [11bc82d6: mm: > > compaction: Use async migration for __GFP_NO_KSWAPD and enforce no > > writeback] would be applied to 2.6.38 before consideration. > > > > Reported-and-Tested-by: Ury Stankevich > > Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman > > > > Reviewed-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki > > BTW, I'm surprised to see both of vmscan.c and compaction.c has too_many_isolated().. > in different logic ;) > > BTW, compaction ignores UNEVICTABLE LRU ? Good point. Yes. now compaction doesn't work with unevictable LRU but I think we have no reason to work well with unveictable pages. If we don't support unevictable lru, it would be a problem in lots of mlocked pages workload. It would be a good enhance point on compaction. > > Thanks, > -Kame -- Kind regards Minchan Kim -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/