Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754274Ab1EaKud (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 May 2011 06:50:33 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:54553 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752180Ab1EaKub (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 May 2011 06:50:31 -0400 Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 12:50:19 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Arun Sharma Cc: Eric Dumazet , David Miller , Maximilian Engelhardt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, StuStaNet Vorstand , Yann Dupont , Denys Fedoryshchenko , Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: Kernel crash after using new Intel NIC (igb) Message-ID: <20110531105019.GF24172@elte.hu> References: <4DDFE4D6.4010000@fb.com> <1306526219.2533.3.camel@edumazet-laptop> <20110527211419.GA6793@dev1756.snc6.facebook.com> <1306561285.2533.9.camel@edumazet-laptop> <20110528180434.GB12530@elte.hu> <1306654424.30021.7.camel@edumazet-laptop> <20110529073840.GB21254@elte.hu> <1306654983.30021.10.camel@edumazet-laptop> <20110529123318.GB26627@elte.hu> <4DE3E32E.5000302@fb.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4DE3E32E.5000302@fb.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.3.1 -2.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1002 Lines: 29 * Arun Sharma wrote: > On 5/29/11 5:33 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > >* Eric Dumazet wrote: > > > >>I asked Arun if he wanted to make this himself, because initial > >>idea was coming from him, not because I did not want to make it ;) > > > >Hey, fair enough and sorry about the fuss! :-) > > Sounds like there is general consensus that such a cleanup would be > good. I'll try to post a patch that does this cleanup for all archs > in the next couple of days - but I won't have a way of testing it > on anything other than x86_64. -mm is a good place to do such many-arch kind of facility cleanups/extensions so please Cc: Andrew if you think the patch is ready to be tested on that level. Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/