Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758405Ab1EaUO3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 May 2011 16:14:29 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:43850 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758248Ab1EaUO2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 May 2011 16:14:28 -0400 Message-ID: <4DE54BFD.2090408@zytor.com> Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 13:13:49 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110428 Fedora/3.1.10-1.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Willy Tarreau CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [kernel.org users] Turning off the incremental diff robot References: <4DE3E9E7.8020008@zytor.com> <20110531195201.GB7995@1wt.eu> In-Reply-To: <20110531195201.GB7995@1wt.eu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 902 Lines: 22 On 05/31/2011 12:52 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > Well, I don't think the incremental patches are *that much* used. > Speaking for my case, my longterm release scripts do produce them > anyway since it's trivial with git, and I suppose many others do > as well. > > I suggest that we disable the robot and wait for any possible > complaints which are to be expected anyway with a version change. > Then it'll be more productive to help tree owners to adapt their > scripts than it would be to keep the robot running. > Yes, this would be one option. It would at least save the effort of chasing problems when it breaks due to tree-owner changes. -hpa -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/