Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751995Ab1FAFjN (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Jun 2011 01:39:13 -0400 Received: from mail-pz0-f46.google.com ([209.85.210.46]:33932 "EHLO mail-pz0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751000Ab1FAFjJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Jun 2011 01:39:09 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=eMjOlYfjvGSsdyNTdrU4kotSaXugQgJ+HKF/Ase0LWTnnzXqcAymdimp5ebYL6udij ciS/L+A+lRl6nhdyRgiIxvE7nET8FgJioQ2F6mgA92l2lZW5cEJzQo/mbCQ96SOjs/4K NGRI40ORuUvkCn/HE1Us9kVz6W6e5urmezqxk= Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 14:39:03 +0900 From: Tejun Heo To: Oleg Nesterov Cc: vda.linux@googlemail.com, jan.kratochvil@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, indan@nul.nu, bdonlan@gmail.com, pedro@codesourcery.com Subject: Re: [PATCHSET ptrace] ptrace: implement PTRACE_SEIZE/INTERRUPT and group stop notification, take#4 Message-ID: <20110601053903.GE23067@mtj.dyndns.org> References: <1306710760-16440-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <20110530154211.GA11325@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110530154211.GA11325@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1133 Lines: 31 Hey, On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 05:42:11PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > On 05/30, Tejun Heo wrote: > > > > * PTRACE_LISTEN added. This puts tracee into quasi-active state where > > wait(2) and sync ptrace requests fail and tracee is allowed to > > re-trap into STOP to notify an async event. > > Nice! > > Personally, I think the whole series is fine. So far I only read it > inline (without applying). I'll try to read it carefully patch-by-patch, > it is always good to try to re-check the details, but I do not expect > I'll find something which should delay this series from merging into > ptrace tree. Yeah, yeah, PTRACE_LISTEN turned out to be pretty easy to implement. I didn't really have to change too much. I'll test different corner cases (different thread doing waking/sleeping, race against INTERRUPT kind of things) and let you know how it goes. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/