Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755369Ab1FAPGO (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Jun 2011 11:06:14 -0400 Received: from mail-ey0-f174.google.com ([209.85.215.174]:44542 "EHLO mail-ey0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750968Ab1FAPGN (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Jun 2011 11:06:13 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type :date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=TZC9tNIdqWDgIX1QUkydJPp+LcyJLFTK8vaJgLQzk9/7k98OQd6PfZRGsKO1S8ROnF MIuxCzpZ7LF53bEhpyst69P0p86i2dPtfEFRIQcwk2qwV3Lq1jrxgSwl0UbMl5oFdDHo kLUvdVjGrfuD7r1SL2ZuGlEEX90ELkaRXcM0o= Subject: Re: [PATCH] ATMEL, AVR32: inline nand partition table access From: Artem Bityutskiy Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com To: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov Cc: Hans-Christian Egtvedt , David Woodhouse , Nicolas Ferre , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard , Andrew Victor , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org In-Reply-To: References: <1306676962-22308-1-git-send-email-dbaryshkov@gmail.com> <1306935129.1097.3.camel@hcegtvedt.norway.atmel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 18:01:49 +0300 Message-ID: <1306940509.4405.121.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 (2.32.2-1.fc14) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1881 Lines: 45 On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 18:54 +0400, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: > On 6/1/11, Hans-Christian Egtvedt wrote: > > On Sun, 2011-05-29 at 17:49 +0400, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: > >> Currently atmel_nand driver used by AT91 and AVR32 calls a special > >> callback > >> which return nand partition table and number of partitions. However in all > >> boards this callback returns just static data. So drop this callback and > >> make atmel_nand use partition table provided statically via platform_data. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov > > > > Thanks for this update, always nice seeing code being optimized. I > > really can't recall why it was made like this in the first place... > > > > For the AVR32 related parts: > > > > Acked-by: Hans-Christian Egtvedt > > > > > > > > Will this go through the linux-mtd tree (since it spans two archs) or > > should it go through an arch tree? > > On one hand, I'd prefer for this to go through the linux-mtd, if noone objects, > as I'd also like to submit several (a pile) patches cleaning up mtd > partitioning, which would depend on this. > > OTOH, I think there will be a cleanup of AT91 platform, which would bring > lot's of conflicts with this patch, if it goes through linux-mtd. Meanwhile, while you are thinking, I've put this patch to the l2-mtd-2.6 tree. Please, let me know if you decide to take a non-mtd path - then I'll drop it. And if you want to see this in linux-next - ping dwmw2. -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/