Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754882Ab1FFHOd (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jun 2011 03:14:33 -0400 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:51238 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752272Ab1FFHOc (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jun 2011 03:14:32 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,325,1304319600"; d="scan'208";a="14090269" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] ep93xx DMA patches From: "Koul, Vinod" To: Mika Westerberg Cc: hsweeten@visionengravers.com, rmallon@gmail.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com, lrg@ti.com, broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com, grant.likely@secretlab.ca, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org In-Reply-To: <20110605081904.GA16018@acer> References: <20110605081904.GA16018@acer> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2011 12:09:40 +0530 Message-ID: <1307342380.10976.79.camel@vkoul-udesk3> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3243 Lines: 80 On Sun, 2011-06-05 at 11:19 +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote: > Vinod, > > As this series has acks for all the subsystem maintainers, would it be ok for > you to take the entire series via your tree? Or do you have any idea how to > get it merged? Please don't top post :( I have applied this series to next including the asoc and spi changes, if anyone has any objections please let me know > > On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 01:10:01PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote: > > This is an updated version of the ep93xx DMA patches. Previous version can be > > found here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/5/22/86. > > > > Changes to v1: > > * removed unnecessary header > > * corrected SPI driver documentation > > * DMA driver platform code is only compiled when CONFIG_EP93XX_DMA is > > enabled > > > > I tried to put all the acks in place, hope I got them right. > > > > There is a dependency between patch 1 and patch 4 which I'm not entirely sure > > how to solve. Basically it is required that we have patch 1 applied before > > patch 4 or merge conflict results. > > > > Otherwise it shouldn't matter in which order the patches arrive to the > > mainline. > > > > Unless someone has a better idea, I suggest that these patches will go through > > their respective subsystem trees. All the maintainers should be copied. > > > > Thanks, > > MW > > > > Mika Westerberg (5): > > dmaengine: add ep93xx DMA support > > ep93xx: add dmaengine platform code > > ASoC: ep93xx: convert to use the DMA engine API > > ep93xx: remove the old M2P DMA code > > spi/ep93xx: add DMA support > > > > Documentation/spi/ep93xx_spi | 10 + > > arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/Makefile | 4 +- > > arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/core.c | 6 +- > > arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/dma-m2p.c | 411 ------- > > arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/dma.c | 108 ++ > > arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/include/mach/dma.h | 190 ++--- > > arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/include/mach/ep93xx_spi.h | 2 + > > drivers/dma/Kconfig | 7 + > > drivers/dma/Makefile | 1 + > > drivers/dma/ep93xx_dma.c | 1355 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > drivers/spi/ep93xx_spi.c | 303 +++++- > > sound/soc/ep93xx/ep93xx-ac97.c | 4 +- > > sound/soc/ep93xx/ep93xx-i2s.c | 4 +- > > sound/soc/ep93xx/ep93xx-pcm.c | 137 ++-- > > 14 files changed, 1930 insertions(+), 612 deletions(-) > > delete mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/dma-m2p.c > > create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/dma.c > > create mode 100644 drivers/dma/ep93xx_dma.c > > > > -- > > 1.7.4.4 > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- ~Vinod -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/