Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756828Ab1FFIGC (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jun 2011 04:06:02 -0400 Received: from newsmtp5.atmel.com ([204.2.163.5]:37341 "EHLO sjogate2.atmel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755115Ab1FFIF7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jun 2011 04:05:59 -0400 Message-ID: <4DEC8A56.1030707@atmel.com> Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2011 10:05:42 +0200 From: Nicolas Ferre Organization: atmel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; fr; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov , Andrew Victor , Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard , David Woodhouse CC: Hans-Christian Egtvedt , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ATMEL, AVR32: inline nand partition table access References: <1306676962-22308-1-git-send-email-dbaryshkov@gmail.com> <1306935129.1097.3.camel@hcegtvedt.norway.atmel.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1918 Lines: 48 Le 01/06/2011 16:54, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov : > On 6/1/11, Hans-Christian Egtvedt wrote: >> On Sun, 2011-05-29 at 17:49 +0400, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: >>> Currently atmel_nand driver used by AT91 and AVR32 calls a special >>> callback >>> which return nand partition table and number of partitions. However in all >>> boards this callback returns just static data. So drop this callback and >>> make atmel_nand use partition table provided statically via platform_data. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov >> >> Thanks for this update, always nice seeing code being optimized. I >> really can't recall why it was made like this in the first place... >> >> For the AVR32 related parts: >> >> Acked-by: Hans-Christian Egtvedt >> >> >> >> Will this go through the linux-mtd tree (since it spans two archs) or >> should it go through an arch tree? > > On one hand, I'd prefer for this to go through the linux-mtd, if noone objects, > as I'd also like to submit several (a pile) patches cleaning up mtd > partitioning, which would depend on this. > > OTOH, I think there will be a cleanup of AT91 platform, which would bring > lot's of conflicts with this patch, if it goes through linux-mtd. I am in favor for a mainline inclusion through linux-mtd tree. On the AT91 side, we will have to take this inclusion into account to avoid merge conflicts... But as long as this cleanup is not ready yet, I prefer to go forward this way. For that purpose, that would be good to see this patch in linux-next. Thanks to all of you, bye, -- Nicolas Ferre -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/