Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757345Ab1FFN0C (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jun 2011 09:26:02 -0400 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:42047 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757192Ab1FFN0A convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jun 2011 09:26:00 -0400 Subject: Re: [debug patch] printk: Add a printk killswitch to robustify NMI watchdog messages From: Peter Zijlstra To: Arne Jansen Cc: Ingo Molnar , Linus Torvalds , mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, efault@gmx.de, npiggin@kernel.dk, akpm@linux-foundation.org, frank.rowand@am.sony.com, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1307356017.2353.7511.camel@twins> References: <20110605151323.GA30590@elte.hu> <20110605152641.GA31124@elte.hu> <20110605153218.GA31471@elte.hu> <4DEBA9CC.4090503@die-jansens.de> <4DEBB05C.8090506@die-jansens.de> <4DEBB3DA.8060001@die-jansens.de> <20110605172052.GA1036@elte.hu> <4DEBBFF9.2030101@die-jansens.de> <20110605185957.GA3452@elte.hu> <4DEBD95B.6030901@die-jansens.de> <20110605194419.GA12965@elte.hu> <4DEBE3DF.70104@die-jansens.de> <1307350909.2353.7408.camel@twins> <4DECA525.7030503@die-jansens.de> <1307356017.2353.7511.camel@twins> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2011 15:25:42 +0200 Message-ID: <1307366742.2322.118.camel@twins> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2216 Lines: 66 On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 12:26 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 12:00 +0200, Arne Jansen wrote: > > As expected this apparently fixes the problem. But are we confident > > enough this is the true source? If it's really that simple, printk > > calling into the scheduler, why am I the only one seeing this? > > Right, so apparently you have contention on console_sem and the up() > actually does a wakeup. I'm still trying to figure out how to do that. On a related note, I'm not quite sure what we need that lockdep_{off,on}() for, I just build and booted a kernel without them and so far life is good. I tried lockdep splats and in-scheduler printk()s (although the latter will still mess up the box if printk()'s up(console_sem) triggers a wakeup for obvious reasons). --- Subject: lockdep, printk: Remove lockdep_off from printk() From: Peter Zijlstra Date: Mon Jun 06 13:37:22 CEST 2011 Remove the lockdep_{off,on}() usage from printk() as it appears superfluous, a kernel with this patch on can printk lockdep output just fine. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra --- Index: linux-2.6/kernel/printk.c =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/printk.c +++ linux-2.6/kernel/printk.c @@ -838,7 +838,7 @@ asmlinkage int vprintk(const char *fmt, preempt_disable(); /* This stops the holder of console_sem just where we want him */ - raw_local_irq_save(flags); + local_irq_save(flags); this_cpu = smp_processor_id(); /* @@ -859,7 +859,6 @@ asmlinkage int vprintk(const char *fmt, zap_locks(); } - lockdep_off(); spin_lock(&logbuf_lock); printk_cpu = this_cpu; @@ -956,9 +955,8 @@ asmlinkage int vprintk(const char *fmt, if (console_trylock_for_printk(this_cpu)) console_unlock(); - lockdep_on(); out_restore_irqs: - raw_local_irq_restore(flags); + local_irq_restore(flags); preempt_enable(); return printed_len; -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/