Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756457Ab1FFR1j (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jun 2011 13:27:39 -0400 Received: from na3sys010aog112.obsmtp.com ([74.125.245.92]:52359 "HELO na3sys010aog112.obsmtp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752121Ab1FFR1i (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jun 2011 13:27:38 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20110606070553.9829.40823.stgit@ponder> References: <20110606070553.9829.40823.stgit@ponder> From: Roland Dreier Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 10:27:17 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: reorganize drivers To: Grant Likely Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 588 Lines: 14 On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 12:06 AM, Grant Likely wrote: > Sort the gpio makefile and enforce the naming convention gpio-*.c for > gpio drivers. OK, bikeshed colors here, but... what is the benefit of 'drivers/gpio/gpio-xxx.c' vs just 'drivers/gpio/xxx.c'? Seems like one 'gpio' should be enough for anyone... - R. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/