Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 29 Jul 2002 09:08:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 29 Jul 2002 09:08:21 -0400 Received: from [195.63.194.11] ([195.63.194.11]:65295 "EHLO mail.stock-world.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 29 Jul 2002 09:08:21 -0400 Message-ID: <3D453DE5.2020901@evision.ag> Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 15:06:45 +0200 From: Marcin Dalecki Reply-To: martin@dalecki.de User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1b) Gecko/20020722 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, pl, ru MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thierry Vignaud CC: martin@dalecki.de, Russell King , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: RFC: /proc/pci removal? References: <20020729131717.A25451@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <3D4532D5.1000706@evision.ag> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 827 Lines: 22 Thierry Vignaud wrote: > Marcin Dalecki writes: > > >>>I seem to vaguely remember that a while ago (2.3 days?) there was >>>discussion about removing /proc/pci in favour of the lspci output, >>>however there doesn't seem much in google groups about it (and >>>marc seems useless with non-alphanumeric searches.) >> >>scanpci from XFree is using it as well. However i would rather still >>like it to be gone despite this inconvenience. > > > neither gatos scanpci nor XFree86' scanpci do: Confirmed. Apparently I forgot about the /bus/ in the path above. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/