Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757937Ab1FFUK7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jun 2011 16:10:59 -0400 Received: from georges.telenet-ops.be ([195.130.137.68]:36114 "EHLO georges.telenet-ops.be" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753712Ab1FFUK6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jun 2011 16:10:58 -0400 Message-ID: <4DED344D.7000005@pandora.be> Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2011 22:10:53 +0200 From: Bart De Schuymer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; nl; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brad Campbell CC: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: KVM induced panic on 2.6.38[2367] & 2.6.39 References: <20110601011527.GN19505@random.random> <4DE5DCA8.7070704@fnarfbargle.com> <4DE5E29E.7080009@redhat.com> <4DE60669.9050606@fnarfbargle.com> <4DE60918.3010008@redhat.com> <4DE60940.1070107@redhat.com> <4DE61A2B.7000008@fnarfbargle.com> <20110601111841.GB3956@zip.com.au> <4DE62801.9080804@fnarfbargle.com> <20110601230342.GC3956@zip.com.au> <4DE8E3ED.7080004@fnarfbargle.com> <4DE906C0.6060901@fnarfbargle.com> In-Reply-To: <4DE906C0.6060901@fnarfbargle.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 110606-1, 06/06/2011), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2594 Lines: 68 Hi Brad, This has probably nothing to do with ebtables, so please rmmod in case it's loaded. A few questions I didn't directly see an answer to in the threads I scanned... I'm assuming you actually use the bridging firewall functionality. So, what iptables modules do you use? Can you reduce your iptables rules to a core that triggers the bug? Or does it get triggered even with an empty set of firewall rules? Are you using a stock .35 kernel or is it patched? Is this something I can trigger on a poor guy's laptop or does it require specialized hardware (I'm catching up on qemu/kvm...)? cheers, Bart PS: I'm not sure if we should keep CC-ing everybody, netfilter-devel together with kvm should probably do fine. Op 3/06/2011 18:07, Brad Campbell schreef: > On 03/06/11 23:50, Bernhard Held wrote: >> Am 03.06.2011 15:38, schrieb Brad Campbell: >>> On 02/06/11 07:03, CaT wrote: >>>> On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 07:52:33PM +0800, Brad Campbell wrote: >>>>> Unfortunately the only interface that is mentioned by name anywhere >>>>> in my firewall is $DMZ (which is ppp0 and not part of any bridge). >>>>> >>>>> All of the nat/dnat and other horrible hacks are based on IP >>>>> addresses. >>>> >>>> Damn. Not referencing the bridge interfaces at all stopped our host >>>> from >>>> going down in flames when we passed it a few packets. These are two >>>> of the oopses we got from it. Whilst the kernel here is .35 we got the >>>> same issue from a range of kernels. Seems related. >>> >>> Well, I tried sending an explanatory message to netdev, netfilter & >>> cc'd to kvm, >>> but it appears not to have made it to kvm or netfilter, and the cc to >>> netdev has >>> not elicited a response. My resend to netfilter seems to have dropped >>> into the >>> bit bucket also. >> Just another reference 3.5 months ago: >> http://www.spinics.net/lists/netfilter-devel/msg17239.html > > and don't mind patching and crashing the machine to get it fixed"> > > Attempted to add netfilter-devel to the cc this time. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe > netfilter-devel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- Bart De Schuymer www.artinalgorithms.be -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/