From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: richard -rw- weinberger <richard.weinberger@gmail.com>
Cc: Christian Dietrich 
	<christian.dietrich@informatik.uni-erlangen.de>,
        "Venkatesh Pallipadi \(Venki\)" <venki@google.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, x86@kernel.org,
        Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
        Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
        Fengzhe Zhang <fengzhe.zhang@intel.com>,
        John Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>,
        Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@profusion.mobi>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
        lguest@lists.ozlabs.org, trivial@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] arch/x86: use printk_ratelimited instead of printk_ratelimit
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTinS67qH-pm2=Z9G1UXk4OOuZNsN9g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <cover.1307199715.git.christian.dietrich@informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <fce87f1efab55e15e91b21f1b73f0e86016a27d9.1307199715.git.christian.dietrich@informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <874o43ii1m.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> <BANLkTinS67qH-pm2=Z9G1UXk4OOuZNsN9g@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 12:41:02 +0930
Message-ID: <87mxhugwu1.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1478
Lines: 38

On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 10:11:53 +0200, richard -rw- weinberger <richard.weinberger@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 8:35 AM, Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> wrote:
> > On Sat, 4 Jun 2011 17:37:04 +0200, Christian Dietrich <christian.dietrich@informatik.uni-erlangen.de> wrote:
> >> Since printk_ratelimit() shouldn't be used anymore (see comment in
> >> include/linux/printk.h), replace it with printk_ratelimited.
> >
> > Acked-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> (lguest part)
> >
> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/lguest/boot.c b/arch/x86/lguest/boot.c
> >> index db832fd..23a6eff 100644
> >> --- a/arch/x86/lguest/boot.c
> >> +++ b/arch/x86/lguest/boot.c
> >> @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@
> >>  #include <linux/lguest_launcher.h>
> >>  #include <linux/virtio_console.h>
> >>  #include <linux/pm.h>
> >> +#include <linux/ratelimit.h>
> >>  #include <asm/apic.h>
> >>  #include <asm/lguest.h>
> >>  #include <asm/paravirt.h>
> >
> > Is this new include really needed?  The printk_ratelimited() definition
> > is in printk.h...
> 
> Yes.
> printk_ratelimited() needs DEFINE_RATELIMIT_STATE() which is defined
> in ratelimit.h.

Yech.  I'm assuming that making printk.h include ratelimit.h makes a
nasty mess?

Thanks,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/