Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 15 Dec 2000 20:52:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 15 Dec 2000 20:52:45 -0500 Received: from zeus.kernel.org ([209.10.41.242]:23560 "EHLO zeus.kernel.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 15 Dec 2000 20:52:38 -0500 Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 17:11:47 -0700 (MST) From: Dan Egli To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Signal 11 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Yes. > > And I realize that somebody inside RedHat really wanted to use a snapshot > in order to get some C++ code to compile right. > > But it at the same time threw C stability out the window, by using a > not-very-widely-tested snapshot for a major new release. > > Are you seriously saying that you think it was a good trade-off? Or are > you just ashamed of admitting that RH did something stupid? > Pardon the poking in here, but I must say I agree here. RH did a VERY dumb thing. > I have a report from a Sony VAIO user that couldn't compile the CVS X at > all on his picturebook (and you need to compile the CVS tree in order to > get required fixes for the ATI Rage Mobility in that machine). I don't > know the details, but they were apparently due to RH 7 issues. It's not in the X tree or anything, but here's a personal example. Machine: Dual P3 550 HDD: Dual Ultra2Wide Seagate 18GB Hdd OS: RedHat 7 Compile Target: Linux Kernel 2.2.17 Result with gcc 2.96: Failure (syntax errors in the i386 branch of the arch tree) Result with compat-egcs-62: Success on the first try. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/