Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 29 Jul 2002 16:52:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 29 Jul 2002 16:52:39 -0400 Received: from thebsh.namesys.com ([212.16.7.65]:30985 "HELO thebsh.namesys.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 29 Jul 2002 16:52:38 -0400 Message-ID: <3D45ABCE.6050201@namesys.com> Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 00:55:42 +0400 From: Hans Reiser User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020529 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Eric W. Biederman" CC: Alexander Viro , Federico Ferreres , Daniel Mose , Larry McVoy , Rik van Riel , Larry McVoy , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, openpatentfunds@home.se Subject: Re: Funding GPL projects or funding the GPL? References: <3D44F136.8060202@namesys.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 743 Lines: 23 Eric W. Biederman wrote: >But the assertion made by Al Viro that software maintenance is where >the bulk of the work is, is interesting. > Another large part of the work is in pursuing innovations in software that fail. Note that failed software is generally not maintained. What I don't understand about Viro's argument is why he thinks that maintainers won't also get paid under the schemes discussed. There is nothing that prevents paying for maintenance in either scheme. -- Hans - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/