Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 17:33:01 +0900
From: Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/15] KVM: optimize for MMIO handled
Message-Id: <20110608173301.fad91fa9.yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp>
In-Reply-To: <4DEF152C.5060808@cn.fujitsu.com>
References: <4DEE205E.8000601@cn.fujitsu.com>
	<20110608121128.2caecdb3.yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp>
	<4DEEEBB6.5090805@cn.fujitsu.com>
	<4DEEED3C.3070302@cn.fujitsu.com>
	<20110608124740.14c807f7.yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp>
	<4DEF152C.5060808@cn.fujitsu.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1010
Lines: 34

On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 14:22:36 +0800
Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:

> On 06/08/2011 11:47 AM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
> 
> >>> Sure, KVM guest is the client, and it uses e1000 NIC, and uses NAT
> >>> network connect to the netperf server, the bandwidth of our network
> >>> is 100M.
> >>>
> > 
> > I see the reason, thank you!
> > 
> > I used virtio-net and you used e1000.
> > You are using e1000 to see the MMIO performance change, right?
> > 
> 
> Hi Takuya,
> 
> Now, i have done the performance test for virtio-net, the performance is
> improved very little, and it is not *regression* ;-)
> 
> The reason is, MMIO generated by virtio-net is very very little.
> 

Yes, so I thought you had chosen e1000 for this test :)

Thanks,
  Takuya

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/