Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755390Ab1FHKaH (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jun 2011 06:30:07 -0400 Received: from mail.bbaw.de ([194.95.188.6]:50722 "EHLO mail.bbaw.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754510Ab1FHKaF (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jun 2011 06:30:05 -0400 Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 12:30:03 +0200 From: Lars =?UTF-8?B?VMOkdWJlcg==?= To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PROBLEM] reproduceable storage errors on high IO load Message-Id: <20110608123003.3569604f.taeuber@bbaw.de> In-Reply-To: <20110606095127.21d23a70.taeuber@bbaw.de> References: <20110606095127.21d23a70.taeuber@bbaw.de> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.0 (GTK+ 2.24.4; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiVirus: checked by Avira MailGate (version: 2.1.4-7; AVE: 7.9.5.12; VDF: 7.11.9.95; host: mailhub); id=26343-aGcsBF Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 763 Lines: 25 Hi there, I just tested again with different accoustic managment settings (128 and 254) in all disks. The problem still remains. Am I the only one using SW-RAID6 and having this problem? I have several other SW-RAID6s productivly running. But they all have at least 12 disks in an array and are very much older (HW + SW). Newer running machines have at least 16 disks running (2.6.35). Should I test older kernels than 2.6.32? Please help me. The box is ready to run all test you suggest me to run. Thanks Lars -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/