Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 05:35:12 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 05:35:02 -0500 Received: from pc7.prs.nunet.net ([199.249.167.77]:2569 "HELO pc7.prs.nunet.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 05:34:54 -0500 Message-ID: <20001218100429.8407.qmail@pc7.prs.nunet.net> From: "Rico Tudor" Subject: Re: ServerWorks docs? To: jeff@aslab.com (Jeff Nguyen) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 100 04:04:29 -0600 (CST) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <04e401c067d1$1e6a90a0$7818b7c0@aslab.com> from "Jeff Nguyen" at Dec 16, 0 06:29:00 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Thanks for the offer, but the basic problem remains: no docs. As jamagallon@able.es noted, http://www.netroedge.com/~lm78/ shows some cause for hope, but a medium-sized LART is still called for. My interest in ServerWorks documentation is two-fold: first, to expand chipset support in my ECC utility and second, to better support ServerWorks-based machines in my workplace. On behalf of the Linux community, I would sign NDA if it was civilized and if my source remained, obviously, public-domain. I could visit ServerWorks on my next foray to the Bay Area. More important to me is ready access to technical documentation to support machines at work. I come from the era when PDP-11's were shipped with schematics, the OS, and the source to the OS. Things have been going downhill ever since. I'm not catching the next plane to the Bay Area for "eyes only" examination of a document every time a problem arises. In this regard, companies like IBM Storage and Intel win my kudos, and my dollars. ServerWorks may get some of those dollars because they have an affordable chipset that supports 4 GB, but that advantage can change overnight. It's not like IP has a long half-life these days, unless you can corner the pyramid-building business. These companies must evaluate their proprietary stance in relation to lost sales, the more so as free source accelerates. ATI, Matrox, Adaptec: need we say more? But then, I'm preaching to the choir. Perhaps ServerWorks should look into their hearts, and decide what small part of their IP has enormous, eternal value -- the kind that will have them rolling in dough, just like Scrooge McDuck. The rest of the specification, like the miserable ECC circuitry that's been done a million times before, release it already! Their adoring Linux fans are waiting. P.S. I wonder if Via reads this list. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/