Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756020Ab1FHVpp (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jun 2011 17:45:45 -0400 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:37397 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752510Ab1FHVpo (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jun 2011 17:45:44 -0400 Subject: Re: [debug patch] printk: Add a printk killswitch to robustify NMI watchdog messages From: Peter Zijlstra To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Arne Jansen , Linus Torvalds , mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, efault@gmx.de, npiggin@kernel.dk, akpm@linux-foundation.org, frank.rowand@am.sony.com, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20110608205253.GA10669@elte.hu> References: <20110606160810.GA16636@elte.hu> <1307376771.2322.168.camel@twins> <20110606161749.GA22157@elte.hu> <4DED0292.1040605@die-jansens.de> <4DED0423.4050904@die-jansens.de> <20110606170725.GD2391@elte.hu> <1307380311.2322.223.camel@twins> <1307548218.3941.6.camel@twins> <20110608191758.GA12457@elte.hu> <1307562329.3941.21.camel@twins> <20110608205253.GA10669@elte.hu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2011 23:49:18 +0200 Message-ID: <1307569758.2497.1012.camel@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1061 Lines: 24 On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 22:52 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > Hm, i thought it would be possible to only express it via the > slowpath: if mutex_trylock() succeeds then *all* execution goes into > the slowpath so we don't have to take all the fastpaths into account. Right, but you first have to take wait_lock, then do the trylock, but that's complicated for asm/mutex-null.h because trylock will then also try to obtain the wait_lock. You can do it by creating ___mutex_trylock_slowpath() which contains the meat of __mutex_trylock_slowpath() and then implement atomic_mutex_trylock{_irq,_irqsave,} using that, not releasing wait_lock on success. Shouldn't be too bad, but it ain't too pretty either. Furthermore, like I said in my initial patch, I share Thomas' worry about 'creative' usage of these primitives. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/