Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S317286AbSG3FKh>; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 01:10:37 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S318211AbSG3FKh>; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 01:10:37 -0400
Received: from sccrmhc02.attbi.com ([204.127.202.62]:13995 "EHLO
	sccrmhc02.attbi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S317286AbSG3FKh>; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 01:10:37 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="us-ascii"
From: Eric Altendorf <EricAltendorf@orst.edu>
Reply-To: EricAltendorf@orst.edu
To: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: What patch to get stable IDE in 2.5?
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 21:45:28 -0700
User-Agent: KMail/1.4.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <200207292145.28411.EricAltendorf@orst.edu>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 660
Lines: 20


A while ago a few people posted a few different patches that purported 
to patch a stable 2.4 IDE system into the 2.5 code tree...but as I 
recall other people pointed out problems in those patches.

Is there a consensus on how to get a stable IDE subsystem in the 2.5 
series kernel?

thanks

eric

-- 
"First they ignore you.  Then they laugh at you.
 Then they fight you.  And then you win."             -Gandhi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/