Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 02:06:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 02:06:23 -0400 Received: from astound-64-85-224-253.ca.astound.net ([64.85.224.253]:8207 "EHLO master.linux-ide.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 02:06:22 -0400 Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 23:03:35 -0700 (PDT) From: Andre Hedrick To: Eric Altendorf cc: lkml Subject: Re: What patch to get stable IDE in 2.5? In-Reply-To: <200207292145.28411.EricAltendorf@orst.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1251 Lines: 39 There are no problems if you get the patch for LAD and not K dot O. The only reason I have not updated them is because I have to release Serial ATA 1.0 now and some where between pre-final and final I broke it. Andre Hedrick LAD Storage Consulting Group On Mon, 29 Jul 2002, Eric Altendorf wrote: > > A while ago a few people posted a few different patches that purported > to patch a stable 2.4 IDE system into the 2.5 code tree...but as I > recall other people pointed out problems in those patches. > > Is there a consensus on how to get a stable IDE subsystem in the 2.5 > series kernel? > > thanks > > eric > > -- > "First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. > Then they fight you. And then you win." -Gandhi > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/