Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S318218AbSG3G3y>; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 02:29:54 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S318219AbSG3G3y>; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 02:29:54 -0400
Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:14465 "EHLO virtualhost.dk")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S318218AbSG3G3x>;
	Tue, 30 Jul 2002 02:29:53 -0400
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 08:33:23 +0200
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: Andre Hedrick <andre@linux-ide.org>
Cc: Eric Altendorf <EricAltendorf@orst.edu>,
       lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: What patch to get stable IDE in 2.5?
Message-ID: <20020730083323.F4445@suse.de>
References: <200207292145.28411.EricAltendorf@orst.edu> <Pine.LNX.4.10.10207292301540.17634-100000@master.linux-ide.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10207292301540.17634-100000@master.linux-ide.org>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 735
Lines: 21

On Mon, Jul 29 2002, Andre Hedrick wrote:
> 
> There are no problems if you get the patch for LAD and not K dot O.

Sorry, but this sort of statement can't help but piss me off. I do all
the work forward porting 2.4 IDE to 2.5, then you slap a LAD label on it
(why?! To sprinkle it with "LAD Storage Consulting Group" [1] pee?) and
claim the foundation on which you stand is _broken_?

Feel free to point out where I'm wrong.

[1] 'group' meant more than 1, last I checked.

-- 
Jens Axboe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/