Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756477Ab1FJMYH (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jun 2011 08:24:07 -0400 Received: from smtp.tele.fi ([192.89.123.25]:51735 "EHLO vulpes-int.media.sonera.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755452Ab1FJMYE (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jun 2011 08:24:04 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 2137 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 08:24:04 EDT X-Originating-Ip: [194.89.68.22] Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 14:48:21 +0300 From: Pasi =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=E4rkk=E4inen?= To: Tim Deegan Cc: Igor Mammedov , Stefano@phlegethon.org, Paul Menage , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Keir Fraser , Stabellini , "containers@lists.linux-foundation.org" , Li Zefan , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Michal Hocko , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , Keir Fraser , "akpm@linux-foundation.org" , "balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com" , KAMEZAWA@phlegethon.org, Hiroyuki , Hiroyuki Kamezawa Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Possible shadow bug Message-ID: <20110610114821.GB32595@reaktio.net> References: <4DE8D50F.1090406@redhat.com> <4DEE26E7.2060201@redhat.com> <20110608123527.479e6991.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <4DF0801F.9050908@redhat.com> <20110609150133.GF5098@whitby.uk.xensource.com> <4DF0F90D.4010900@redhat.com> <20110610100139.GG5098@whitby.uk.xensource.com> <20110610101011.GH5098@whitby.uk.xensource.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110610101011.GH5098@whitby.uk.xensource.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1180 Lines: 26 On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:10:11AM +0100, Tim Deegan wrote: > At 11:01 +0100 on 10 Jun (1307703699), Tim Deegan wrote: > > Actually, looking at the disassembly you posted, it looks more like it > > might be an emulator bug in Xen; if Xen finds itself emulating the IMUL > > instruction and either gets the logic wrong or does the memory access > > wrong, it could cause that failure. And one reason that Xen emulates > > instructions is if the memory operand is on a pagetable that's shadowed > > (which might be a page that was recently a pagetable). > > > > ISTR that even though the RHEL xen reports a 3.0.x version it has quite > > a lot of backports in it. Does it have this patch? > > http://hg.uk.xensource.com/xen-3.1-testing.hg/rev/e8fca4c42d05 > > Oops, that URL doesn't work; I meant this: > http://xenbits.xen.org/xen-3.1-testing.hg/rev/e8fca4c42d05 > RHEL5 Xen (hypervisor) reports version as 3.1.2-xyz.. -- Pasi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/