Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 08:35:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 08:35:46 -0400 Received: from mg03.austin.ibm.com ([192.35.232.20]:63716 "EHLO mg03.austin.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 08:35:46 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Dave Kleikamp To: Thomas Molina Subject: Re: 2.5.27: JFS oops Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 07:38:49 -0500 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.4] Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: <200207300738.50302.shaggy@austin.ibm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1175 Lines: 31 On Monday 29 July 2002 19:33, Thomas Molina wrote: > On Mon, 29 Jul 2002, Dave Kleikamp wrote: > > On Monday 29 July 2002 10:06, Axel Siebenwirth wrote: > > I haven't seen this trap before. I'll take a closer look at it, > > and let you know what I find. > > > > > Can I use jfs from cvs with current kernels > > > (2.5.29/2.4.19-rc3-ac3) to see how latest changes work? > > > > Yes. You should be able to just replace everything under fs/jfs > > with what's in cvs. > > Are you saying jfs in 2.5.29 jfs is not a problem? I'm looking to > see if I should put it on my problem status report. 2.5.29 had a problem that is fixed in Linus's bk tree. I had posted a patch to this list as well. (Simply remove the calls to d_delete from namei.c.) Axel is seeing traps that I haven't seen elsewhere, so that's another potential problem. We don't know the cause of that one yet. -- David Kleikamp IBM Linux Technology Center - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/