Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756184Ab1FJNUp (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jun 2011 09:20:45 -0400 Received: from defer-dn03.ocn.ad.jp ([125.170.100.156]:60985 "EHLO defer-dn03.ocn.ad.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755368Ab1FJNUm (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jun 2011 09:20:42 -0400 Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 22:19:01 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20110610.221901.193681450.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> To: viresh.kumar@st.com Cc: dan.j.williams@intel.com, linus.walleij@linaro.org, vinod.koul@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, shiraz.hashim@st.com, armando.visconti@st.com, bhupesh.sharma@st.com, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Why move all map_sg/unmap_sg for slave channel to its client? From: Atsushi Nemoto In-Reply-To: <4DF19251.1090100@st.com> References: <4DF19251.1090100@st.com> X-Fingerprint: 6ACA 1623 39BD 9A94 9B1A B746 CA77 FE94 2874 D52F X-Pgp-Public-Key: http://wwwkeys.pgp.net/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x2874D52F X-Mailer: Mew version 5.2 on Emacs 22.2 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 629 Lines: 19 On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 09:11:05 +0530, viresh kumar wrote: > >>> I thought map_sg/unmap_sg for slave channels will be handled according > >>> to the flags passed in prep_slave_sg(). But then i found following patch: ... > Linus, Dan, > > Got it. Thanks for your replies. JFYI, the old discussion was here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/24/114 --- Atsushi Nemoto -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/