Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 15 Dec 2000 13:27:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 15 Dec 2000 13:27:38 -0500 Received: from asterix.hrz.tu-chemnitz.de ([134.109.132.84]:21477 "EHLO asterix.hrz.tu-chemnitz.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 15 Dec 2000 13:27:20 -0500 Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 19:56:11 +0100 From: Ingo Oeser To: ferret@phonewave.net Cc: Petr Vandrovec , Dana Lacoste , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [OT] Re: Linus's include file strategy redux Message-ID: <20001215195611.L829@nightmaster.csn.tu-chemnitz.de> In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: ; from ferret@phonewave.net on Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 09:31:57AM -0800 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 09:31:57AM -0800, ferret@phonewave.net wrote: > > Maybe you did not notice, but for months we have > > /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build/include, which points to kernel headers, > > and which should be used for compiling out-of-tree kernel modules > > (i.e. latest vmware uses this). > > This symlink really should be a copy instead, because the finished kernel > may be installed on a machine that does not have kernel source installed > on it. Dangling symlinks are BAD. But if you compile for another machine, this copy is bad. It also takes to much time and space to create this copy. I really disagree here. Regards Ingo Oeser -- 10.+11.03.2001 - 3. Chemnitzer LinuxTag <<<<<<<<<<<< come and join the fun >>>>>>>>>>>> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/