Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753400Ab1FMODc (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jun 2011 10:03:32 -0400 Received: from smtp-out.google.com ([216.239.44.51]:53075 "EHLO smtp-out.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751917Ab1FMODa (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jun 2011 10:03:30 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=google.com; s=beta; h=date:from:x-x-sender:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id :references:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=a7Yf9oAfxfu4uJjrKjUQ5e2Vvk4aljxi0Y4zE4RGwuqHQ6dRHyUIK+wxi9ENGloaTm hU2k1PRAPZ7EY04CcAsQ== Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 07:03:03 -0700 (PDT) From: Hugh Dickins X-X-Sender: hugh@sister.anvils To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki cc: Johannes Weiner , Andrea Arcangeli , Ying Han , Dave Jones , Linux Kernel , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , Oleg Nesterov , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH] [BUGFIX] update mm->owner even if no next owner. In-Reply-To: <20110613105410.e06720f1.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Message-ID: References: <20110610091355.2ce38798.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20110610113311.409bb423.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20110610121949.622e4629.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20110610125551.385ea7ed.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20110610133021.2eaaf0da.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20110610235442.GA21413@cmpxchg.org> <20110611175136.GA31154@cmpxchg.org> <20110613105410.e06720f1.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LSU 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-System-Of-Record: true Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1120 Lines: 27 On Mon, 13 Jun 2011, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 18:41:58 -0700 (PDT) > Hugh Dickins wrote: > > > > The version I've signed off and am actually testing is below; > > but I've not had enough time to spare on the machine which reproduced > > it before, and another I thought I'd delegate it to last night, > > failed to reproduce without the patch. Try again tonight. > > > > Thought I'd better respond despite inadequate testing, given the flaw > > in the posted patch. Hope the one below is flawless. > > > > Thank you, I'll do test, too. I confirm it fixes the bug: ran ten hours last night, when a couple of tries just before without the patch each failed in ten minutes. (But the load was not testing whether it keeps ownership when it should, I hope you know a quick check on that: our earlier fixes should fail that.) Hugh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/