Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 13:28:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 13:28:37 -0400 Received: from tmr-02.dsl.thebiz.net ([216.238.38.204]:33293 "EHLO gatekeeper.tmr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 13:28:36 -0400 Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 13:25:37 -0400 (EDT) From: Bill Davidsen To: Jakob Oestergaard cc: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk , Kernel mailing list Subject: Re: RAID problems In-Reply-To: <20020725121109.GA25999@unthought.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1094 Lines: 30 On Thu, 25 Jul 2002, Jakob Oestergaard wrote: > Just like the last time you asked this question on linux-kernel, the > answer is in the Software RAID HOWTO, section 6.1, and it is still > available at > > http://unthought.net/Software-RAID.HOWTO/Software-RAID.HOWTO-6.html#ss6.1 > > Nothing has changed :) > > If you feel that the answer there is inadequate, please let me know. I think he did by asking for help again. You might well have pointed him at a newsgroup or mailing list (there was one for RAID) so he could get some interractive support. Why does no one seem surprised that one drive failed and the system marked four bad instead of using the spare in the first place? That's a more interesting question. -- bill davidsen CTO, TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/