Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752101Ab1FNNaK (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Jun 2011 09:30:10 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:14137 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751083Ab1FNNaH (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Jun 2011 09:30:07 -0400 Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 16:30:07 +0300 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: Shirley Ma Cc: David Miller , Eric Dumazet , Avi Kivity , Arnd Bergmann , netdev@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 0/4 net-next] macvtap/vhost TX zero-copy support Message-ID: <20110614133006.GA13258@redhat.com> References: <1306610077.5180.78.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1306610077.5180.78.camel@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 5115 Lines: 109 On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 12:14:37PM -0700, Shirley Ma wrote: > This patchset add supports for TX zero-copy between guest and host > kernel through vhost. It significantly reduces CPU utilization on the > local host on which the guest is located (It reduced about 50% CPU usage > for single stream test on the host, while 4K message size BW has > increased about 50%). The patchset is based on previous submission and > comments from the community regarding when/how to handle guest kernel > buffers to be released. This is the simplest approach I can think of > after comparing with several other solutions. > > This patchset has integrated V3 review comments from community: > > 1. Add more comments on how to use device ZEROCOPY flag; > 2. Change device ZEROCOPY to available bit 31 > 3. Fix skb header linear allocation when virtio_net GSO is not enabled > > It has integrated V4 review comments from MST and Sridhar: > 1. In vhost, using socket poll wake up for outstanding DMAs > 2. Add detailed comments for vhost_zerocopy_signal_used call > 3. Add sleep in vhost shutting down instead of busy-wait for outstanding > DMAs. > 4. Copy small packets, don't do zero-copy callback in mavtap, mark it's > DMA done in vhost > 5. change zerocopy to bool in macvtap. > > It has integrated V5 review comments from MST and > Michał Mirosław > 1. Prevent userspace apps from holding skb userspace buffers by copying > userspace buffers to kernel in skb_clone, skb_copy, pskb_copy, > pskb_expand_head. > 2. It is also used HIGHDMA, SG feature bits to enable ZEROCOPY to remove > the dependency of a new feature bit, we can add it later when new > feature bit is available. > > It has integrated V6 review comments from Eric Dumazet. > 1. Moving ubuf_info object from skb to caller, just use one pointer in > skb_share_info to point ubuf_info object. > > 2. Change the zero-copy size from 256 bytes to PAGE_SIZE (4K) because of > the small message size performance issue. > > 3. During vhost shutting down, release outstanding userspace buffers w/o > waiting for lower device DMAs done if any. Do we really care about the > possible wrong data being sent on the wire during shutting down? Yes, we do. IMHO the right approach is to wait for DMAs to be done - just use a sleep/wake up construct, not a timed sleep. > This patchset includes: > 1/4: Add a new sock zero-copy flag, SOCK_ZEROCOPY; > > 2/4: Add a new struct skb_ubuf_info in skb_share_info for userspace > buffers release callback when lower device DMA has done for that skb, > which is the last reference count gone; Or whenever skb_clone, skb_copy, > pskb_copy, pskb_expand_head get call from tcpdump, filtering, these > userspace buffers will be copied into kernel ... we don't want userspace > apps to hold userspace buffers too long. > > 3/4: Add vhost zero-copy callback in vhost when skb last refcnt is gone; > add vhost_zerocopy_signal_used to notify guest to release TX skb > buffers. > > 4/4: Add macvtap zero-copy in lower device when sending packet is > greater than PAGE_SIZE. > > The patchset is built against linux-2.6.39. It has passed > netperf/netserver multiple streams stress test, tcpdump > suspended test, dynamically SG change test. > > Single TCP_STREAM 120 secs test results 2.6.39-rc3 over ixgbe 10Gb NIC > results: > > Message BW(Gb/s)qemu-kvm (NumCPU)vhost-net(NumCPU) PerfTop irq/s > 4K 7408.57 92.1% 22.6% 1229 > 4K(Orig)4913.17 118.1% 84.1% 2086 > 8K 9129.90 89.3% 23.3% 1141 > 8K(Orig)7094.55 115.9% 84.7% 2157 > 16K 9178.81 89.1% 23.3% 1139 > 16K(Orig)8927.1 118.7% 83.4% 2262 > 64K 9171.43 88.4% 24.9% 1253 > 64K(Orig)9085.85 115.9% 82.4% 2229 > > For message size less or equal than 2K, there is a known KVM guest TX > overrun issue. With this zero-copy patch, the issue becomes more severe, > guest io_exits has tripled than before, so the performance is not good. > Once the TX overrun problem has been addressed, I will retest the small > message size performance. > > drivers/net/macvtap.c | 131 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- > drivers/vhost/net.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++- > drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++ > drivers/vhost/vhost.h | 15 ++++++ > include/linux/skbuff.h | 25 +++++++++ > include/net/sock.h | 1 + > net/core/skbuff.c | 83 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > 7 files changed, 338 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/