Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 14:50:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 14:50:12 -0400 Received: from pc2-cwma1-5-cust12.swa.cable.ntl.com ([80.5.121.12]:7408 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 14:50:12 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.5-rmap: VM strict overcommit From: Alan Cox To: Pavel Machek Cc: Robert Love , akpm@zip.com.au, riel@conectiva.com.br, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds In-Reply-To: <20020729222052.GA15219@elf.ucw.cz> References: <1026928763.1116.11.camel@sinai> <20020726103104.GA279@elf.ucw.cz> <1027694803.13428.43.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> <20020729222052.GA15219@elf.ucw.cz> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.3 (1.0.3-6) Date: 30 Jul 2002 21:09:30 +0100 Message-Id: <1028059770.7886.34.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 676 Lines: 15 On Mon, 2002-07-29 at 23:20, Pavel Machek wrote: > But it could happen that kernel would attempt to allocate 101% of RAM > for page tables, right? At that even "paranoid overcommit" might be > OOM, right? Paranoid mode guarantees that the process wont get killed for OOM. It doesn't guarantee that the machine itself won't die. For obvious reasons thats a rather more complex guarantee, but one I'd like to see possible in future - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/