Subject: Re: REGRESSION: Performance regressions from switching
 anon_vma->lock to mutex
From: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>, Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
        KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
        David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
        Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>, Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>,
        Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>, Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
        "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
        KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
        Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>, "Shi, Alex" <alex.shi@intel.com>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
In-Reply-To: <4DF91CB9.5080504@linux.intel.com>
References: <1308097798.17300.142.camel@schen9-DESK>
	 <1308101214.15392.151.camel@sli10-conroe> <1308138750.15315.62.camel@twins>
	 <20110615161827.GA11769@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
	 <1308156337.2171.23.camel@laptop> <1308163398.17300.147.camel@schen9-DESK>
	 <1308169937.15315.88.camel@twins> <4DF91CB9.5080504@linux.intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 14:12:16 -0700
Message-ID: <1308172336.17300.177.camel@schen9-DESK>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1138
Lines: 32

On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 13:57 -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> >       7.44%        exim  [kernel.kallsyms]              [k] format_decode
> >                    |
> >                    --- format_decod
> 
> 
> This is a glibc issue. exim calls libdb and libdb asks sysconf for the 
> number of CPUs to tune
> its locking, and glibc reads /proc/stat.  And /proc/stat is incredible slow.
> 
> I would blame glibc, but in this case it's really the kernel to blame 
> for not providing proper
> interface.
> 
> This was my motivation for the sysconf() syscall I submitted some time ago.
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/5/13/455
> 
> Anyways a quick workaround is to use this LD_PRELOAD: 
> http://halobates.de/smallsrc/sysconf.c
> But it's not 100% equivalent.
> 

Thanks to Andi for providing the info.  We've used this workaround in
our testing so it will not mask true kernel scaling bottlenecks.

Tim

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/