Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 19:37:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 19:37:53 -0400 Received: from vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca ([136.159.55.21]:51080 "EHLO vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 19:37:52 -0400 Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 17:41:13 -0600 Message-Id: <200207302341.g6UNfDF11136@vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca> From: Richard Gooch To: Roman Zippel Cc: Greg KH , , Subject: Re: [BK PATCH] devfs cleanups for 2.5.29 In-Reply-To: References: <200207302312.g6UNC7Z10529@vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 800 Lines: 25 Roman Zippel writes: > Hi, > > On Tue, 30 Jul 2002, Richard Gooch wrote: > > > With your > > "fixups", those drivers will break when "devfs=only" is passed in. > > That feature is broken by design already anyway. devfs has > absolutely no business managing that device pointer. You're > duplicating code and it only makes it harder to properly protect > it. As far as I can see it's still broken wrt to module unloading. No, it's not. Look more closely. Regards, Richard.... Permanent: rgooch@atnf.csiro.au Current: rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/