Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 22:49:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 22:49:19 -0400 Received: from nycsmtp2out.rdc-nyc.rr.com ([24.29.99.227]:1439 "EHLO nycsmtp2out.rdc-nyc.rr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 22:49:18 -0400 Message-ID: <3D474F48.1030109@linux.org> Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 22:45:28 -0400 From: John Weber Organization: Linux Online User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1a) Gecko/20020702 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: janitorial PATCH: 2.4: nvram.c Lindent References: <3D47170E.20003@sun.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 602 Lines: 19 > If you're doing these kinds of Lindent changes, you might as well also > fix another non-linuxism: > > return (x); -> return x; > > I don't know why some people seem to think that "return" is a function > with an argument.. Excuse me? Anyone care to explain? > I guess that one isn't mentioned in the CodingStyles thing. I'm lazy. > Bad Bad Linus. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/