Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755736Ab1FPNJg (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:09:36 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:10344 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755446Ab1FPNJe (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:09:34 -0400 Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 15:06:13 +0200 From: Oleg Nesterov To: Cedric Le Goater Cc: Greg Kurz , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ebiederm@xmission.com, containers@lists.osdl.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, xemul@openvz.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Introduce ActivePid: in /proc/self/status (v2, was Vpid:) Message-ID: <20110616130613.GC19312@redhat.com> References: <20110615145527.4016.70157.stgit@bahia.local> <20110615190302.GA16440@redhat.com> <1308223158.8230.66.camel@bahia.local> <4DF9F657.7030605@fr.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4DF9F657.7030605@fr.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1369 Lines: 41 On 06/16, Cedric Le Goater wrote: > > We have a case where a task in a parent pid namespace needs to kill > another task in a sub pid namespace only knowing its internal pid. > the latter has been communicated to the parent task through a file or > a unix socket. OK, thanks, this partly answers my question... But if they communicate anyway, it is not clear why the signal is needed. > This 'ActivePid' information in /proc is not sufficient to identity > the task, you also need the list of the tasks which are living in > the pid namespace. Yes, I see. > a new kill syscall could be the solution: > > int pidns_kill(pid_t init_pid, pid_t some_pid); > > where 'init_pid' identifies the namespace and 'some_pid' identifies > a task in this namespace. this is very specific but why not. Yes, I also thought about this. Should be trivial. Or int sys_tell_me_its_pid(pid_t init_pid, pid_t some_pid). Just in case.... This is hack, yes, but in fact you do not need the kernel changes to send a signal inside the namespace. You could ptrace sub_init, and execute the necessary code "inside" the namespace. Oleg. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/