Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 31 Jul 2002 08:46:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 31 Jul 2002 08:46:37 -0400 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:60423 "HELO garrincha.netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 31 Jul 2002 08:46:36 -0400 Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 09:49:46 -0300 (BRT) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@imladris.surriel.com To: Petr Vandrovec cc: akpm@zip.com.au, Subject: Re: BUG at rmap.c:212 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1234 Lines: 43 On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Petr Vandrovec wrote: > yesterday I told (in IDE thread) that BUG at rmap.c:212 is probably > already fixed by changeset 520. Unfortunately, it is not, I got it again > with BK tree. It happened again when 'ntpd' called exit() upon receiving > sigterm. Line 212 is 'pte_chain_unlock(page);' right ? What configuration are you running ? SMP ? PREEMPT ? What compiler ? > Stack trace: > > page_remove_rmap > zap_pte_range > zap_pmd_range > unmap_page_range > exit_mmap > mmput > do_exit > sys_exit > syscall_call > > If it is not known bug, I'll rebuild kernel with DEBUG_RMAP. > Unfortunately it looks like that machine must have uptime > 12hrs to > trigger this. Probably updatedb or some other task must be run to try to > swap ntpd out? It is not a known bug. In fact I've never seen this one before. kind regards, Rik -- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH". http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/